We build compact AI messaging tools.
JustAnIota official shield mark JustAnIota UAI tooling ɩ.com Compact AI messaging tools Language-neutral AI messaging: registries, schemas, validation.
Draft IOTA-1 tools
  • Current surface JustAnIota tooling draft
  • Plain-English definition Compact, structured AI messaging tools
  • Current attribution Michael Joseph Kappel, MCP
  • Short-domain status ɩ.com redirects to JustAnIota.com

Governance / Trust

Accessibility

Accessibility requirements for dense specifications, tool consoles, locale handling, code blocks, and validation reports.

  • Record JAI-GOVR-0031
  • Path /governance/accessibility/
  • Use Canonical public record

Document status

Public standards page Published on JustAnIota.com as part of the current public standards record
Code
JAI-GOVR-0031
Surface
Governance / Trust
Access
Public and linkable

How to use this page

Use this page for the current public accessibility posture across launch pages, validator workflows, and release QA.

Review with

Policy and SecurityPrivacy and DataAnalyticsValidator

Accessibility Posture

Keep readable launch pages and manual QA attached to release work

This page is the current public statement for keyboard flow, readability, mobile layout, and accessibility-significant QA across the launch surface.

Readable surfaces

The current claim is about public reading quality

The launch surface should keep real text, predictable heading structure, contrast-safe presentation, and readable technical surfaces rather than relying on decorative or inaccessible shortcuts.

Manual QA

Template changes should travel with checks

Search, validator, support panels, code blocks, and navigation changes should carry keyboard and mobile QA before release.

Future work

Do not imply a certification program

The current posture is release-facing and operational; a formal office, certification badge, or wider institutional program is not yet published.

Review with

Policy and SecurityTrust hub and cross-cutting release posture.Privacy and DataPublic-reading and discovery posture that often overlaps with accessibility.AnalyticsMeasurement scripts and embeds can affect front-end accessibility.ValidatorPrimary interactive technical surface to review.ChangelogDated record for accessibility-significant changes.

Accessibility posture

How the current launch surface should remain readable and reviewable

Use this matrix when a reviewer needs the current public accessibility boundary across reading pages, technical pages, and release-facing QA.

Operating areaPublished nowVerify hereNot yet public
Readable public pagesPrimary launch pages should keep real text, readable structure, and contrast-safe presentation rather than decorative or inaccessible shortcuts.Do not imply a broader certification program or office from the current release-facing posture.
Keyboard and interactive flowNavigation, search, validator interactions, support panels, and copy controls should remain keyboard-reachable and understandable.Formal accessibility help desks, audit programs, or published remediation workflows are not yet public.
Release-facing QATemplate and content changes should carry keyboard, readability, overflow, and mobile checks before release.The current posture is not a guarantee that every future page is audited independently before publication.

The current public claim is operational and release-facing: keyboard flow, readability, mobile-safe layout, and real text should travel with launch work.

Accessibility release packet

How accessibility-significant changes should travel

Use this sequence when a release changes templates, navigation, code examples, validator interactions, or mobile behavior on the launch surface.

  1. Step 1

    Check keyboard flow

  2. Step 2

    Check text, contrast, and heading structure

  3. Step 3

    Check mobile layout and overflow

  4. Step 4

    Attach QA notes to the release

  5. Step 5

    Publish the dated trail

Manual QA and the release trail should move together so another reviewer can understand both the claim and the change.

Plain English

Dense technical tools still need to be readable and operable.

Technical summary

Pages should use semantic headings, keyboard-reachable controls, visible focus, labeled form fields, and validation output that does not depend on color alone.

Deep spec

PUA previews need textual names and code point displays because many systems render private-use characters as blank boxes.

Tool UI requirements

  • Every control has a visible label.
  • Outputs update in an aria-live region.
  • Warnings are text, not only color.
  • Long code blocks and tables remain scrollable on mobile.